|Paper No. 178-3|
|Presentation Time: 2:05 PM-2:25 PM|
|LARGE-IMPACT TRIGGERED TSUNAMI DEPOSITS IN THE DEEP SEA: EXAMPLES FROM THE 65MA CHICXULUB CRATER AND 2.5-2.6GA HAMERSLEY BASIN|
SMIT, Jan, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, de Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081HV, Netherlands, email@example.com, SIMONSON, Bruce M., Geology Department, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH 44074, HASSLER, Scott, John F. Kennedy Univ, Orinda, CA 94563, and SUMNER, Dawn, Geology Department, Univ of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616|
Large-impact triggered deposits in the deep sea are usually massflows and turbidites. These deposits can be distinguished from normal turbidites by the incorporation of impact ejecta, such as microtektite-like spherules, but otherwise are thought to have no special diagnostic features. Numerous K/T boundary outcrops in eastern Mexico contain a sandstone layer whose origin is clearly related to the Chicxulub impact because it contains impact ejecta from Chicxulub such as tektite-like droplets and spherules. However, often these clastic layers do not display the standard Bouma Ta-Te sequence, but have repeated graded intervals, reversed current directions and channel-like geometry. Stinnesbeck et al. (2001) describe in the same sections up to four separate spherule layers supposedly separated by normal Cretaceous pelagic intervals. We found these ‘normal’ layers to consist of large, soft, rip-up clay blebs. The interpretation that each layer represents a separate impact is unlikely, because the tektite-like and the limestone ejecta grains are identical in all three layers. The probability of three impacts producing exactly the same ejecta seems extremely small. The Late Archean Wittenoom (spherule) layer in the Hamersley basin (Western Australia) often occurs in the form of a single turbidite, with impact spherules at the base. In places such as the Wittenoom Gorge, however, the layer is complex, shows repeated grading and reversed current directions, and is quite similar to the K/T sandstone layer. We interpret such complex sandstone layers as tsunami wave-induced deposits and/or turbidites modified by tsunami-induced currents and countercurrents.
2002 Denver Annual Meeting (October 27-30, 2002)
|Session No. 178|
Colorado Convention Center: A102/104/106
1:30 PM-5:30 PM, Tuesday, October 29, 2002
© Copyright 2002 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.